Back
819 days ago

Inland Revenue on the hunt for 170,000 bank account numbers to process Cost of Living Payment

Brian from New Lynn

As many as 170,000 people are at risk of missing out on the Government's $350 Cost of Living Payment, because the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) doesn't have their bank account numbers.
Addressing Parliament's Finance and Expenditure Committee, IRD acting commissioner and chief executive Cath Atkins said she is confident the tax department can track down most of these people.
It has already sourced around 130,000 bank account numbers, which it didn't have.
But IRD believes it'll struggle to contact 11,000 of the 170,000 people it still needs to get hold of.
Around 2.1 million people, who earn less than $70,000 a year (before tax) and don't receive the Winter Energy Payment, are eligible for the payment, unveiled at the May Budget.
Atkins said as many as 750 IRD staff will be required to administer the scheme at peak times when payments fall due.
She said 300 of these staff are being contracted for a five-month period, largely to deal with inquiries from the public.
The payment will be paid in three monthly instalments of $116.67 starting from August 1.
Those eligible don't need to apply; they'll receive it automatically. But they may like to check, via the myIR online portal, whether IRD has their correct bank account number.
People have until March 31, 2023 to update their details with IRD to get the payment.
Finance Minister Grant Robertson has allocated $814 million towards the payment.
IRD confirmed $14m of this will go towards the 300 contractors' wages, office space, IT infrastructure, postage and printing.
Pressed by National MPs Andrew Bayly and Nicola Willis about the cost associated with administering the payment, Atkins said some of the contractors had been working on projects that are wrapping up, including IRD's Business Transformation project, and Covid-related support.
She said it was important IRD was adequately staffed to address public inquiries, which are likely to escalate when payments fall due.
Green MP Chlöe Swarbrick asked Revenue Minister David Parker, who also appeared before the committee, whether IRD would be able to employ fewer contractors if the payment was more universal.
Parker said this would simply cost a lot more.
He also said employing 300 contractors isn't as material as one might think, given IRD has been cutting staff in recent years.
It employed 4106 full-time equivalents in the year to June 2021 – a drop from 5401 in 2017.
Parker said IRD needs to be able to continue doing its other work while it administers the Cost of Living Payment.
He said IRD having more people's bank account numbers will also make the tax system more efficient in the long term.
National Party finance spokeswoman Nicola Willis characterised the Cost of Living Payment as a "bureaucratic dog's breakfast".
"IRD is now having to build a massive bureaucracy to administer it, and taxpayers are being landed with the bill," she told.
She questioned exactly how much the 300 contractors were being paid, noting IRD's recruitment effort is taking place at a time the labour market is exceptionally tight. IRD wouldn't disclose this information.
Furthermore, she said, "Far from targeted, IRD has confirmed that many high-income earners will qualify while thousands of lower income earners will miss out due to missing bank account details.
"Instead of going into bureaucratic overdrive, the Government should have simply inflation-adjusted existing income tax brackets."
Act leader David Seymour believed the Cost of Living Payment exemplifies "rushed policy by ministers who don't ask practical questions".
"The payment is inflationary to the extent that it helps," he told.
"The Prime Minister said, earlier in the week, that she didn't think it would be inflationary because it wouldn't last very long. Well, it also makes it less effective at achieving its underlying goal.
"There are a whole lot of reasons why it's not a good policy. The only conclusion you can come to is, they felt a need to do something to address the political imperative of having an answer to the cost of living crisis."
======================================================

Image
More messages from your neighbours
3 days ago

Poll: Should drivers retake the theory test every 10 years?

The Team from Neighbourly.co.nz

Drivers get where they need to go, but sometimes it seems that we are all abiding by different road rules (for example, the varying ways drivers indicate around a roundabout).
Do you think drivers should be required to take a quick driving theory test every 10 years?

Vote in the poll and share any road rules that you've seen bent! 😱

Image
Should drivers retake the theory test every 10 years?
  • 49.5% Yes
    49.5% Complete
  • 48.6% No
    48.6% Complete
  • 1.9% Other - I'll share below
    1.9% Complete
2604 votes
14 hours ago

Here's Thursday's thinker!

Riddler from The Neighbourly Riddler

I am lighter than air, but a hundred people cannot lift me. What am I?

Do you think you know the answer to our daily riddle? Don't spoil it for your neighbours! Simply 'Like' this post and we'll post the answer in the comments below at 2pm.

Want to stop seeing riddles in your newsfeed?
Head here and hover on the Following button on the top right of the page (and it will show Unfollow) and then click it. If it is giving you the option to Follow, then you've successfully unfollowed the Riddles page.

Image
8 hours ago

Why make picking up reserved library books harder? What do you think? Challenge: Write the last stanza for the first poem attached below.

Alan from Titirangi

Once books are reserved in Auckland Libraries books, when they are available no longer go alphabetically by customer but instead go into a Holds pickup shelf number based presumably somehow on when each book needs to be picked up by.

I had two books reserved that arrived on two different days in the Blockhouse Bay Library and hence each book has a different shelf number. Hard to find unless you knew the shelf number in the notification email. Even if you knew the shelf number I found myself three books by the same author on the two shelf numbers.

More recently yesterday a book I reserved was on a different shelf number than was specified in my notification email (see image below).

Sadly it is clear from library staff that a numerical system for reserves is here to stay.

I suggest that so that all books for each person has the same shelf number, the shelf number becomes the last digit of a person's library card (0-9).

Within each shelf number a book is found under the day the reserve arrives in the library (01 to 31, hopefully the same date the email is sent).

Since a customer appears to have 10 days to pick up a book, ten days of the month would appear to be required at any time (for each digit 0-9).

Once there are 10 days used the next day's reserves could go back at the beginning of the shelf number after any remaining books not collected (hopefully none) are removed (along with the old day number and the new day number (01 to 31) inserted) after the last day available and future days' books remaining moved forward to make room.

Each day number (01-31) would appear once for each shelf number (0-9) before the first book on that day- perhaps cover an old withdrawn book with paper with each day number on the spine?

When a reserved book arrives in the library the last digit of the library card could be placed on a piece of paper in the book to be removed when it is put on the shelf, to be recycled the next day.

What do you think?

See the image below and page 3 below for a letter appearing in the Western Leader on 9 September:
www.neighbourly.co.nz...

PoemReservingBooks.pdf Download View