Poll: Should we move to four-year council terms?
By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
North Canterbury’s three mayors are backing calls for a four-year council term.
Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) has established an electoral reform group to consider changes to increase voter participation and implement four-year terms.
It will be led by Nelson mayor Nick Smith, a former government minister.
Waimakariri mayor Dan Gordon said his council supported moving from a three to a four-year term.
‘‘It is not the biggest priority, but it would certainly make a difference.
‘‘It has been long advocated for and the Future for Local Government Review panel recommended it.’’
He said elections were costly and by holding them less often, councils would have more time to implement their work programmes.
Long-term plans would also likely be moved to four-yearly, instead of every three years, which would take the pressure of council staff, he said.
Hurunui mayor Marie Black said she also supported four-year terms.
‘‘I never really agreed with it for a long time, but now I see the value, because it is costly to have elections and I think the volume of work and outcomes over a four-year term would be greater.’’
She said councillor remuneration would need to be considered, as four years would be a major commitment for councillors juggling other employment.
‘‘I first came in as a councillor working part-time for Plunket and I was able to juggle work around meetings.
‘‘But you’ve got to be able to do that, so it places some pressures on councillors.’’
Kaikōura mayor Craig Mackle said four-year terms were needed for central Government, but he also supported local government making the change.
LGNZ president Sam Broughton said a four-year term would ‘‘double the amount of usable time’’ for councils.
He said the first year after an election was spent getting systems in place and for new councillors learning their roles, while the second year was spent working work on long-term plans.
‘‘And then the following January you start thinking about the next election.’’
Broughton said indications were the Government was considering having a referendum on four-year terms, which would likely include changing central government terms as well.
‘‘It is unusual around the world to have a three-year term.
‘‘Most countries have a four-year or even a five-year term.’’
The electoral reform group will focus on increasing voter turnout, transitioning to four-year terms, considering the ways people can vote, who should administer local elections and how they are best run.
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown said the Government was preparing a Bill on four-year terms, but a final decision would be subject to a binding referendum.
■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
-
63.2% Yes
-
36.8% No
-
0% I'm not sure/something else (share your thoughts in the comments)
Riddle Me This: Can You Out-Smart Yesterday’s Champ?
How can the number four be half of five?
Do you think you know the answer to our daily riddle? Don't spoil it for your neighbours! Simply 'Like' this post and we'll post the answer in the comments below at 2pm.
Want to stop seeing riddles in your newsfeed?
Head here and hover on the Following button on the top right of the page (and it will show Unfollow) and then click it. If it is giving you the option to Follow, then you've successfully unfollowed the Riddles page.
Proposed Canterbury landfill faces huge opposition
By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
More than 500 submissions have been received in response to a proposed managed fill landfill in North Canterbury.
Christchurch-based Protranz International Ltd has applied to Environment Canterbury and the Waimakariri District Council for resource consents to establish and operate a quarry and landfill operation at White Rock.
Waimakariri District Council planning manager Wendy Harris said the applicant was up against ‘‘probably the most organised local group I’ve ever seen’’.
‘‘They organised a protest march, they’ve got signs all around and they’ve got a website and a Facebook page.’’
She said the 548 submissions was more than the 421 submissions to the draft Waimakariri District Plan, which was notified in 2021.
A proposed housing development at Ohoka, near Rangiora, in 2022 received 630 submissions.
While the details of the submissions have yet to be released, it is understood the majority are opposed.
Harris said planners from the two councils will plan joint hearings early next year.
More than 100 people marched from Southbrook in Rangiora to the Waimakariri District Council lawn in High St in September to express their opposition.
Organiser Mike McCaleb said residents are concerned about the potential environmental damage to the Karetu River, which feeds into the Okuku River, and then the Ashley/Rakahuri River.
He said he was surprised there were not more submissions but said he was aware of several people who had issues with Environment Canterbury’s website timing out.
‘‘It will be interesting to see the details of the submissions.’’
Protranz is seeking to restore the Whiterock Quarry, at 150 and 174 Quarry Rd, North Loburn, to near its previous landform, by filling it with managed fill, building and demolition waste and contaminated soil material, including asbestos.
The company bought Whiterock Quarry in 2022 with plans to fill it with soils and inert construction rubble removed from building and land development sites in Christchurch and North Canterbury, which are sent to Kate Valley Landfill.
‘‘Sending this stuff to Kate Valley adds a massive cost to developers, homeowners and community organisations who have dirt to move, and fills Kate Valley with material that can be better managed somewhere else,’’ Protranz founder Gerard Daldry said.
He said Protranz commissioned a wide range of testing including site investigations, technical assessments and design of the managed fill to support the resource consent applications.
The reports found environmental risks were ‘‘extremely low and able to be mitigated’’, Daldry said.
■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Poll: Do you think NZ should ban social media for youth?
The Australian Prime Minister has expressed plans to ban social media use for children.
This would make it illegal for under 16-year-olds to have accounts on platforms including TikTok, Instagram, Facebook and X.
Social media platforms would be tasked with ensuring children have no access (under-age children and their parents wouldn’t be penalised for breaching the age limit)
.
Do you think NZ should follow suit? Vote in our poll and share your thoughts below.
-
84.3% Yes
-
14.2% No
-
1.5% Other - I'll share below
Loading…
