Back
723 days ago

Spotlight on farmland

Nicole Mathewson Reporter from Northern Outlook

From local democracy reporter David Hill:

A new policy to protect farmland could put the brakes on new urban developments in North Canterbury.

The new National Policy Statement on highly productive land, announced by the Government on Sunday, September 18, with immediate effect, requires developers to demonstrate land they wish to develop does not contain ‘‘highly productive soil’’.

Councils have three years to develop soil maps for their districts.

Hurunui District Council chief executive Hamish Dobbie said the intention of the new NPS was good, ‘‘but the execution will be a little more problematic’’.

‘‘It’s a good thing that this is in place because it means this land can continue to produce food instead of houses.

‘‘We have to take account of the NPS now, but the mapping is not in place, so there will be a whole process to work through.

‘‘But I think the rush to develop land might be over as the developer will now need to show that the land is not highly productive.’’

Waimakariri District Council development planning manager Matt Bacon said his team was still trying to ‘‘work through the implications’’ of the new NPS and what it meant for the District Plan review.

The proposed District Plan, notified last year, had rural residential options in the eastern part of the district, with minimum four hectare blocks outside the main towns.

Farmland was protected in the western part of the district with the rural zone comprising a 20ha limit.

‘‘There are still some questions around productive land in rural lifestyle areas, but it still has to be 4ha minimum, so it can still be used for productive use,’’ Bacon said.

Kaikōura District Council strategy, policy and planning manager Matt Hoggard said the council was still reviewing what the NPS would mean for the district.

But he welcomed the NPS’s intentions.

‘‘Until our land is mapped by the [Canterbury] regional council we can’t be sure how it will effect us.

‘‘Our initial impression is that the NPS’s effects may be useful for the district, although we are not anticipating an extensive impact in our region.’’

The NPS used Landcare Research’s five soil categories, with the first three considered ‘‘highly productive’’.

Highly productive land would need to be identified in regional policy statements and district plans.

The NPS restricted rezoning of highly productive land into urban, but an exemption could apply to tier one and two councils if the land was needed ‘‘to give effect to the National Policy Statement on Urban Development’’.

The Waimakariri district is tier one.

The NPS also discouraged rezoning highly productive land as rural lifestyle.

* Public interest journalism funded through NZ on Air.

More messages from your neighbours
J
8 minutes ago

New Business

James from Swannanoa - Ohoka

Hi everyone I am starting a handyman / home assist business. I am able to do most tasks from Flatpack assembly to building planter boxes or just getting those jobs done that need doing around the house like clearing out rubbish water blasting the paths etc. I am local in Swannanoa and happy to travel within the Waimakariri area. Feel free to email me on 27vtwin@gmail.com or call me on 021500623
Thanks
James

17 minutes ago

Poll: How do you feel about dogs being allowed indoors in cafes?

The Team from Neighbourly.co.nz

For most of us, seeing a friendly doggo while out and about instantly brings a smile to our faces. But how do you feel about cafes welcoming pups inside?

Cast a vote and share your thoughts below.

Image
How do you feel about dogs being allowed indoors in cafes?
  • 0% I love it!
    0% Complete
  • 0% Only in designated areas
    0% Complete
  • 0% No, it should be outdoors only.
    0% Complete
0 votes
7 days ago

Poll: Should drivers retake the theory test every 10 years?

The Team from Neighbourly.co.nz

Drivers get where they need to go, but sometimes it seems that we are all abiding by different road rules (for example, the varying ways drivers indicate around a roundabout).
Do you think drivers should be required to take a quick driving theory test every 10 years?

Vote in the poll and share any road rules that you've seen bent! 😱

Image
Should drivers retake the theory test every 10 years?
  • 48.2% Yes
    48.2% Complete
  • 50% No
    50% Complete
  • 1.9% Other - I'll share below
    1.9% Complete
3499 votes