Back
127 days ago

Community board joins fight against Canterbury landfill plan

Nicole Mathewson Reporter from The Press

By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter

Community concerns over the environmental impact of a proposed landfill in North Canterbury have led to a local community board taking a stand.

The Rangiora-Ashley Community Board will make a submission against a landfill being proposed by Christchurch firm Protranz Earthmoving Limited at its quarry at White Rock, near North Loburn.

Protranz has lodged resource consent applications with Environment Canterbury and the Waimakariri District Council to construct and operate a proposed landfill for the disposal of building and demolition waste, and contaminated soil material.

Board chairperson Jim Gerard said the community board members decided to stand alongside the local community, who were concerned about the risks to groundwater and the local Karetu River.

He said the board would seek financial assistance from the Waimakariri District Council to seek specialist advice to help prepare its submission.

‘‘We are representing the community so we need to ensure whatever information we do present, is presented as well as it is able to be.’’

At a recent meeting, a sub-committee of Gerard and board members Ivan Campbell and Kirstyn Barnett, who represent the board’s Ashley sub-division, was appointed to work on the submission.

Gerard said he had met with White Rock and North Loburn residents to discuss their concerns.

‘‘We talked about what we were doing and have kept them informed.’’

A residents’ group is preparing its own submission.

Oxford residents and the Oxford-Ohoka Community Board were recently successful in their opposition to a proposed landfill at View Hill, near Oxford.

Questions have been raised about whether another landfill is needed, given the Kate Valley Landfill, a regional landfill in North Canterbury, has plenty of capacity.

‘‘It is particularly well managed and internationally noted for its operation,’’ Gerard said.

‘‘We would hope any consent, if granted, will cover all of those things.’’

The Burwood Landfill in Christchurch had its consent to operate extended last month for another two years to June 2026, because it has yet to reach its capacity.

About 100 White Rock and Loburn residents attended a public meeting in February and have since formed an incorporated society to organisation the opposition to the landfill proposal.

Spokesperson Mike McCaleb said there ‘‘was a high degree of anger, disappointment and resentment’’ expressed by people throughout North Canterbury.

‘‘So many people were depressed, stressed and feeling hopeless about their ability to affect the proceedings.’’

Bouyed by the recent Oxford landfill decision, the residents now feel more confident.

‘‘We are a small community with a big heart. We have many passionate and committed professionals in our community.’’

McCaleb said residents were concerned about the potential environmental damage to the Karetu River, which feeds into the Okuku River and then the Ashley/Rakahuri River.

Increased truck movements was another concern, particularly trucks carrying asbestos and other contaminants to the landfill.

Protranz general manager Shaun Coakley said he respected the community board’s decision.

‘‘We knew the development of critical infrastructure such as a managed fill landfill would attract attention from the local community, hence our decision to voluntarily publicly notify.

‘‘Whether by providing additional information that clarifies their issues or collaborating to establish consent conditions that mitigate their concerns, we're committed to an open dialogue.’’

Consents have been lodged with both Environment Canterbury and the Waimakariri District Council, and are on hold, awaiting more information.

■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

More messages from your neighbours
16 hours ago

Poll: Should all neighbours have to contribute to improvements?

The Team from Neighbourly.co.nz

An Auckland court has ruled a woman doesn’t have to contribute towards the cost of fixing a driveway she shares with 10 neighbours.

When thinking about fences, driveways or tree felling, for example, do you think all neighbours should have to pay if the improvements directly benefit them?

Image
Should all neighbours have to contribute to improvements?
  • 81.6% Yes
    81.6% Complete
  • 15.6% No
    15.6% Complete
  • 2.8% Other - I'll share below
    2.8% Complete
604 votes
1 day ago

Neighbourhood Challenge: Who Can Crack This One?

Riddler from The Neighbourly Riddler

This belongs to you, but everyone else uses it.

Do you think you know the answer to our daily riddle? Don't spoil it for your neighbours! Simply 'Like' this post and we'll post the answer in the comments below at 2pm.

Want to stop seeing riddles in your newsfeed?
Head here and hover on the Following button on the top right of the page (and it will show Unfollow) and then click it. If it is giving you the option to Follow, then you've successfully unfollowed the Riddles page.

Image
3 days ago

What's your favourite tomato recipe?

Mei Leng Wong Reporter from NZ Gardener & Get Growing

Kia ora neighbours. We know your tomato plants are still growing, but we're looking ahead to the harvest already! If you've got a family recipe for tomatoes, we'd love to see it and maybe publish it in our magazine to share with our readers. Send your recipe to mailbox@nzgardener.co.nz, and if we use it in the mag, you will receive a free copy of our February 2025 issue.

Image