Back
1733 days ago

Auckland Flat Owner Dispute with Body Corporate so they Can Enter His Apartment at Any Time

Max from Northcote

An Auckland city-centre flat owner is upset he has to hand over a key to his complex's body corporate so they can enter his apartment at any time.

Queen St apartment owner Zhiren "James" Xian's frustration stems from a dispute over a heat pump and a balcony filled with wine bottles, "decorative figurines" and washing.

His body corporate board accused him of leaving too much rubbish on his balcony, using it to hang his washing out and decorating it with figurines.

But they also complained he had installed a heat pump for an air-conditioning unit without their consent and they asked for permission to come inspect it and make sure it was safe.

When Xian didn't give permission, they informed him they would enter his unit on a set date to check anyway.

Xian said he only got two hours' notice of the entry because the body corporate emailed him at a wrong address and was extremely upset to arrive home and find them already in his apartment.

The drawn-out saga that was heard at the Tenancy Tribunal this month had cost him cash and contributed to "a severe mental illness" requiring visits to counsellors and a psychiatrist, he said.

However, his claims the body corporate had harassed him and entered his flat unlawfully were rejected in a recent Tenancy Tribunal decision.

Tribunal adjudicator John Hogan said body corporates were authorised to enter any flat in a complex they ran for either emergency situations or to ensure the flat was maintained in a safe condition.

The issue in Xian's flat was he didn't use the body corporate's recommended company to install his heat pump.

The body corporate subsequently entered his flat with an inspector and made a judgment the heat pump had been installed incorrectly and quoted Xian about $4000 to use their recommended company to fix the job.

The body corporate's inspector said the installation presented a fire risk and might also send contaminated air to other residents in the building.

At the Tenancy Tribunal, the body corporate sought to get an order to force Xian to use their company to uninstall the air conditioner and heat pump and fix the problems.

But adjudicator Hogan sided with experts brought by Xian, proving the air conditioner was safe and installed correctly.

Hogan subsequently rejected the body corporate's order to force Xian to uninstall his heat pump.

Xian told the Herald he chose not to use the body corporate's recommended company because he found a quote $1000 cheaper from another installer.

He then wouldn't let the body corporate into his flat to inspect the installation job because he thought they'd just be looking for problems.

"I suspected once they knew I did the installation, they will just come in and make up some reason to say it was put in wrong and then issue me another high-priced repair quote, which is exactly what they did," he said.

But while Hogan sided with Xian's experts in determining the heat pump and air conditioner had been put in safely, he said Xian had no right to refuse the body corporate entry.

"Xian believed strongly that the body corporate should have simply accepted his advice that effectively 'all was well' with the heat pump insulation, when of course it was the body corporate's obligation to check that out," Hogan said.

Hogan also said the body corporate had acted in good faith throughout the saga.

"While the circumstances were stressful for all parties ... they occurred within an acceptable context, and I make no finding of a breach of quiet enjoyment," he said.

He ruled Xian must comply with body corporate rules in keeping his balcony free of washing, decorative figurines and rubbish at all times.

Xian said this was a moot point because he had already complied with this requirement.

Hogan also ordered Xian to change his front door lock to a standard lock that allowed the body corporate to use a master key to access his apartment at any time in case of emergencies.

Source: Ben Leahy is a reporter for the New Zealand Herald

Image
More messages from your neighbours
5 hours ago

Sleep Puzzle Time!

Jay from Beds4U Glenfield

Can you find all the words related to sleep? Test your knowledge and let’s see how many you can solve!

Down
1. A piece of furniture for sleeping or resting.
2.A sound made during sleep caused by the vibration of the throat.

Across
1. A state of sleep; deep rest.
2. To cease work or movement to relax or recover strength.

#crosword #sunday #beds4u

Image
22 hours ago

Feeling Smart? Prove It with Today’s Tricky Riddle!

Riddler from The Neighbourly Riddler

What is there one of in every corner and two of in every room?

Do you think you know the answer to our daily riddle? Don't spoil it for your neighbours! Simply 'Like' this post and we'll post the answer in the comments below at 2pm.

Want to stop seeing riddles in your newsfeed?
Head here and hover on the Following button on the top right of the page (and it will show Unfollow) and then click it. If it is giving you the option to Follow, then you've successfully unfollowed the Riddles page.

Image
3 days ago

What workplace change would you like to see most?

The Team from Neighbourly.co.nz

This coming Monday is Labour Day in New Zealand. This public holiday marks when the eight-hour workday and 48-hour workweek became law in 1899. The idea started with Samuel Parnell, a carpenter in Wellington, who in 1840 refused to work more than eight hours a day. Since skilled workers were in short supply, his employer had to agree.

As more skilled workers arrived, employers tried to change working conditions, but Parnell and others kept pushing for better rights. In 1890, Parnell led a Labour Day parade of 1,500 people to promote the eight-hour day. He passed away shortly after, and nine years later, Labour Day became an official public holiday.

Do you feel that we have reached the ideal in working environments yet? What rights are you passionate about relating to employment? Share your thoughts!

Image