Thank you for using Neighbourly
By local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
Fresh resource consent applications by a controversial private landfill near Greymouth could now go to a public hearing.
West Coast Regional Council staff on June 4 advised the council's Resource Management Committee fresh applications for … View moreBy local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
Fresh resource consent applications by a controversial private landfill near Greymouth could now go to a public hearing.
West Coast Regional Council staff on June 4 advised the council's Resource Management Committee fresh applications for Taylorville Resource Park should be referred to an independent panel.
They include an application to vary an existing consent and two new discharge consents relating to odour and water leachate, which is the runoff that filters through landfill waste.
Council planning consultant Selva Selvarajah said they had reviewed the fresh applications and engaged an expert consultant for an assessment.
The new report was in train but it was awaiting fresh information from the applicant, "who have been asked to provide answers," he said.
"We will be recommending to publicly notify the resource consent applications," Selvarajah said.
In line with this, the application should be heard by an independent commissioner panel, he said.
Chief executive Darryl Lew said an independent commissioner could be appointed on behalf of Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Waewae.
However, given various comments at the council table previously about the Taylorville site, the two current regional councillors accredited as hearing commissioners were "probably conflicted" about appointment to an independent panel, he said.
Whether the Grey District Council, as an interested party, would follow a similar panel process was not yet known, Lew said.
The landfill site was first granted consents on a non-notified basis by council for what is now Taylorville Resource Park, in 2021 and 2022.
But the site has been dogged with controversy, including the district council flagging its unhappiness at not being considered an affected party in the first place - despite its Greymouth town water supply being adjacent to the proposed landfill.
There have also been multiple neighbour complaints to the regional council including odour, dust, and water leachate from the site resulting in several previous abatements.
The council itself commissioned an independent audit of its role in giving consent - with damning findings in mid-2023.
The site is currently under an abatement notice from the Environmental Protection Authority after the regional council asked it to take over its ongoing investigation of the site early this year.
A WorkSafe investigation has yet to formally conclude after two workers were overcome by gas within the site on August 3, 2023.
Councillor Allan Birchfield, who has a relationship to the consultant used for the site's original applications, questioned the evidence of "ongoing odour discharges".
Lew said there had been several "verified breaches".
"That's been well documented and recorded. They have also released discharge from water at the site onto adjacent property and that water has had a degree of contamination," he said.
Birchfield asked if the landfill was so bad, why was the Environmental Protection Authority allowing the site to still operate under its current abatement?
Lew said Birchfield would need to ask the authority.
Selvarajah said the main issue at hand was the fresh consent process rather than the compliance issues.
Councillor Peter Ewen said when it came to complaints under the Resource Management Act, "it's never a numbers game: it's about the complaint".
From the outset the implications of allowing the site consent in a high rainfall area without measures to handle run off from the site had been problematic, he said.
"That's why we have ended up where we have ended up - just another end game."
Lew said at this point there was little more council could do.
"There is nothing we can do to fully shutdown the site at all, as long as they are abiding by their existing consents."
By local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
The West Coast Regional Council has agreed to consider rejoining Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ), but only to represent the entire local government sector in the region.
In mid-2023, the council kicked to touch its membership to the body which … View moreBy local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
The West Coast Regional Council has agreed to consider rejoining Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ), but only to represent the entire local government sector in the region.
In mid-2023, the council kicked to touch its membership to the body which represents New Zealand councils.
The year before, in 2022, it put LGNZ on notice after querying the collective cost and benefit to West Coast ratepayers.
LGNZ charged fees for each of the region's three district councils and its regional council.
LGNZ president and Selwyn mayor Sam Broughton fronted council in April, talking up the benefits of membership, while noting membership was based on an individual council, not the number of ratepayers.
He received a cool reception but a staff report back to council this week suggested council should reconsider now, or defer it again until 2025.
In recent months the Westland and Grey district councils have decided not to renew their LGNZ membership, although Buller last month confirmed it will remain a member.
Regional council acting chairman Brett Cummings said it would make sense to have at least one council in the region as an LGNZ member.
Councillor Frank Dooley, the sole voice in 2023 to keep LGNZ membership, said he wanted clarity about the council's benefit in the past year of being part of the alternative regional councils' sector group Te Uru Kahika.
Council chief executive Darryl Lew said the question of LGNZ membership was for council, not management. However, the council would "not survive" without the input of Te Uru Kahika.
It provided crucial tools such as a shared compliance framework template for example which were invaluable for the regional sector, Lew said.
The main benefit for the council from Te Uru Kahika was at an operational level and "to a degree, politically, so we don't have to reinvent the wheel".
Lew said LGNZ membership could be "a political vehicle" for councillors.
At the same time, there was "very little operational benefit" by returning to LGNZ whereas Te Uru Kahika had successfully elevated to a national level in recent years a collective approach to the likes of flood infrastructure, he said.
Councillor Mark McIntyre asked if the council would get $41,000 of value by re-joining LGNZ.
Lew replied "that's up to you", but Westland and Grey councils deemed their membership was not good value.
Te Runanga o Ngāti Waewae representative Francois Tumahai said he saw some value in the region being collectively represented by LGNZ.
That could be via one council and he suggested this be canvassed at an upcoming mayors, chairs, and iwi leaders' forum.
"It's definitely useful to be in there, but not at an astronomical sum," Tumahai said.
Dooley agreed, saying representation for one council was important at a national level.
He called on council to give its chair and the chief executive discretion to confirm membership.
However, councillor Peter Ewen said he was still opposed to LGNZ but would go with one voice for the four councils.
Ewen said "giving away $41,000" to LGNZ was still questionable in his mind.
He would be happy for the LGNZ matter to be an "action point" rather than a recommendation, he said.
This was supported five votes to one.
Respite care is a great short break option for a family member or loved one that also helps give carers some time out to recharge the batteries. There are a range of circumstances which might require respite overnight or support for day care.
It could be needed after a hospital stay or just as a… View moreRespite care is a great short break option for a family member or loved one that also helps give carers some time out to recharge the batteries. There are a range of circumstances which might require respite overnight or support for day care.
It could be needed after a hospital stay or just as a little extra support for caregivers. Respite care ranges from a few days and even up to a few weeks. A loved one, who lives in their own home, will have their short respite stay in one of our village centres.
Click read more for the full article.
These members have been drawn as our winners of the $150 Farmers vouchers:
Melissa Mary from Motueka
Devangi Patel from Blockhouse Bay
Olive White from Ilam
… View moreThese members have been drawn as our winners of the $150 Farmers vouchers:
Melissa Mary from Motueka
Devangi Patel from Blockhouse Bay
Olive White from Ilam
Simon Cullen from Paraparaumu
Not a winner? Good luck next time!
Winners can get in touch here or by emailing helpdesk@neighbourly.co.nz before 11th June.
The skies might be grey but there's colour in our communities - and we want to see it!
Resene and Neighbourly have teamed up this winter to bring you Bright Spots - a celebration of the brightest and most colourful spaces in our neighbourhoods. We want you to snap and share all those spots… View moreThe skies might be grey but there's colour in our communities - and we want to see it!
Resene and Neighbourly have teamed up this winter to bring you Bright Spots - a celebration of the brightest and most colourful spaces in our neighbourhoods. We want you to snap and share all those spots in your neighbourhood that bring a smile to your face and add a little colour to your day.
There are 10 prizes of $250 Resene ColorShop vouchers and $250 Prezzy® cards up for grabs so you can create your own Bright Spot!
Enter your local bright spots pics today and be in to *WIN*.
This winter, we are celebrating the 2024 Olympics with our TV Guide readers with a chance to win 1 of 4 65” Panasonic 4K TVs worth $3,999 each.
Pick up a copy of the TV Guide each week starting from the June 1 - 7 issue, find the codeword, and follow the directions to be in to win! We’ve put… View moreThis winter, we are celebrating the 2024 Olympics with our TV Guide readers with a chance to win 1 of 4 65” Panasonic 4K TVs worth $3,999 each.
Pick up a copy of the TV Guide each week starting from the June 1 - 7 issue, find the codeword, and follow the directions to be in to win! We’ve put a codeword in each of the following three issues, so find them all for more chances to win. You’ll have until July 3 to enter online or mail in your codeword. T&Cs apply.
By local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
Flood-stricken landowners and the West Coast Regional Council are on tenterhooks on the promise of new funding for Franz Josef under $400m of new protection money announced in the Budget.
The council's Waiho River south and north banks project… View moreBy local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
Flood-stricken landowners and the West Coast Regional Council are on tenterhooks on the promise of new funding for Franz Josef under $400m of new protection money announced in the Budget.
The council's Waiho River south and north banks project has been named as "ready for" the first tranche of the Regional Infrastructure Fund initial allocation in 2024-25.
However, whether the council gets the $10m it has been seeking in the past year in ongoing discussions with Government officials is not yet clear.
Council chief executive Darryl Lew initially said on Friday a $6m allocation under the new fund was confirmed.
However, staff later contacted LDR and said they "might have jumped the gun".
Minister Shane Jones' office said they did not know the individual project details and were unable to confirm the West Coast project allocation beyond Thursday's sweeping budget statement.
Lew said he understood council was to get $6m from the fund, predicated on a 40% ($4m) contribution from the landowners across the Franz Josef Special Joint Rating District.
He said bolstering the existing protection on the Waiho River south side and installing a flood forecasting and warning system was the primary focus of their $10m scheme.
A portion would also add protection for the north bank Franz Josef sewage ponds site - pending a district council decision to move the ponds, Lew said.
The council assured Waiho River ratepayers in April it was still working to secure the release of $8.7m of money previously allocated for the area's flood protection.
The $8.7m was meant to be spent on fixing stop banks on the south side of the river at Waiho Flat after announcement of a broader $24m scheme for the area in 2020.
Subsequently the council announced its 10-year Waiho River Management Strategy in October last year after the previous Government asked for a more detailed case including retreat from the south bank.
Under the strategy, the council proposes better flood warning and protection initially before a retreat from the area in about 10 years.
Lew said the $8.7m had now "gone" and money under the Regional Infrastructure Fund was "new money".
"It is predicated on a 60/40 split," he said.
"The total budget will be $10m of which 40% has to be recovered locally."
He anticipated a special meeting of the joint committee being called first to test "their commitment" to co-funding.
Waiho Flat ratepayers spokesman Dale Straight said stressed landowners on the south bank were hanging for some good news - particularly in the wake of the October announcement.
"There's people there pretty bloody stressed and worried," he said.
If the new funding "comes to pass" then it would be a major boost.
"It's been a pigs ear in the way it's been handled," he said.
"It's got to be good news for the south side, and certainly some of the farms further down the valley that are not really covered by any protection at all."
However, Straight said ratepayers may not feel able to financially commit to co-funding given the drawn out process they had endured for years.
"We had that nearly $8.7m promised four years ago that then got 'unpromised'. This may go someway to replace that I suppose."
Straight said the promise of "money for nothing" still had a price which might be "a big noose around our necks".
"There's a bit of water to go under the bridge yet."
Lew said the new money was aligned with the first two prongs of the 10-year Waiho River Management Strategy.
That was to immediately bolster civil defence and flood warning for the people living there, and to bolster the existing protection banks.
It would still be to "buy time" before an eventual staged retreat from the river's south bank, as announced in October.
Don’t miss out! For only $15 a ticket, you could be in to win this brand-new, fully furnished Jennian home located in gorgeous Papamoa, worth just over $1.1 million.
Featuring three bedrooms, two bathrooms and an open-plan kitchen, living and dining area, this home is waiting to be loved by … View moreDon’t miss out! For only $15 a ticket, you could be in to win this brand-new, fully furnished Jennian home located in gorgeous Papamoa, worth just over $1.1 million.
Featuring three bedrooms, two bathrooms and an open-plan kitchen, living and dining area, this home is waiting to be loved by its new owner.
Make this property your permanent residence, a holiday home, rent it or even sell it! Get your tickets today at heartlottery.org.nz.
Every year, thousands of New Zealanders are called up to serve as jurors in the High and District Courts, and it's an important way to contribute to your country.
But for some, jury service can be a huge disruption and a financial burden. Do you think changes could be made to our jury … View moreEvery year, thousands of New Zealanders are called up to serve as jurors in the High and District Courts, and it's an important way to contribute to your country.
But for some, jury service can be a huge disruption and a financial burden. Do you think changes could be made to our jury service system to address these challenges?
By local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
Transfer of a controversial Franz Josef flood bank into West Coast Regional Council ownership remains to be seen as engineers assess the extent of its leaks.
The Havill Wall was controversially authorised by former Westland mayor Bruce Smith and … View moreBy local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
Transfer of a controversial Franz Josef flood bank into West Coast Regional Council ownership remains to be seen as engineers assess the extent of its leaks.
The Havill Wall was controversially authorised by former Westland mayor Bruce Smith and his close ally, former councillor Durham Havill, following an April 2016 storm.
The event saw the Waiho (Waiau) River overtop an existing stopbank at the northern entrance to Franz Josef and wipe out the sewage treatment site.
It also ruined the now abandoned Scenic Group Franz Josef Mueller Wing hotel complex.
Transfer of the wall's ownership to the regional council is included in its 2024-34 long-term plan (LTP) as it moves to complete a $12.5 million stop bank improvement scheme in the area.
But during the recent formal LTP hearing, council chief executive Darryl Lew said the underlying engineering integrity of the Havill Wall still needs to be better understood.
Councillor Peter Ewen said he still felt uneasy about the Havill Wall and wanted to see how it coped with "a real southerly storm".
Councillor Andy Campbell, chair of the Franz Josef Joint Rating District, said the wall as it was, "may never stop leaking".
Lew said the regional council knew full well of the Havill Wall's "seepage" issue.
But at this stage council needed to fully understand to what extent that seepage compromised the structure's flood protection value.
Lew said all flood banks administered by council across the region to some extent "have seepage" and were never entirely "impervious flood barriers," he said.
It was if the degree of seepage was "acceptable to its viability", with that aspect currently under engineering investigation.
Lew said if the seepage was assessed as acceptable without compromising the protection value of the wall, "then that's fine".
If not, then it would not be acceptable to take on ownership.
Lew also noted the Government money for the north bank scheme had included future mitigation of the Havill Wall.
Ewen asked if the ownership transfer idea also extended to an emergency extension built at the end of the wall by the district council, following the January 2024 weather event.
The district council built the small extension amidst fears that, with the Waiho River having swung north into the neighbouring Tatare Stream, it might eventually take out the Franz Josef sewage ponds on the same side.
Lew said what the district council had done was "really an isolated" piece of work and the regional council did not intend to take it on.
The Havill Wall was controversially thrown up without regional council consent.
In 2017 Westland District got a grilling from the Office of the Auditor General over its actions, and the wall subsequently got retrospective consent.
The regional council has already undertaken work on the Havill Wall under its $12m Waiho northern bank protection scheme - which aims to increase resilience for the tourist hotspot of Franz Josef.
By local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
West Coasters could pay a universal rate for flood protection assets in future - regardless of where they live.
The West Coast Regional Council will consider various options as part of a rating district review due by 2027.
Currently, 23 special … View moreBy local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
West Coasters could pay a universal rate for flood protection assets in future - regardless of where they live.
The West Coast Regional Council will consider various options as part of a rating district review due by 2027.
Currently, 23 special rating districts pay targeted rates to maintain river stop banks or coastal protection walls in their area.
The rating district setup, on behalf of local communities, includes the three main towns of Greymouth, Westport, and Hokitika, the tourist hotspots of Punakaiki and Franz Josef, and multiple farming communities along the region's 650km length.
A report to councillors for the 2024-34 long-term plan (LTP) said the rating district review was included in consultation to indicate it "was required".
The way individual rating districts were founded had resulted in "a range of different rating scenarios" and constitutional arrangements.
It left "a level of complexity and inefficiency" in the gambit of what each rating area was for.
Haast submitter Vance Boyd said the benefit of rating districts was viewed differently within particular communities and it was a potentially divisive issue.
At the same time small communities struggled to raise the necessary capital to add protection.
Boyd said the council should rate across "the whole district" rather than relying on individual rating for particular areas.
Councillor Peter Ewen said the "bigger picture" of wider community benefit from protection assets had to be highlighted.
This was relevant for those outside a particular rating area who gained the benefit of accessing a service centre like Greymouth for example.
"The whole community benefits from those rating districts, it doesn't matter where they are," he said.
Long-time Westport surveyor Chris Coll also said the special rating district net should be thrown for the widest community benefit.
He estimated up to 15% of the town of Westport could fall "outside" the projected flood protection scheme for his area, yet all residents in the area would benefit from it.
Council chief executive Darryl Lew noted Westport was "a greenfield scheme" at this point and identifying the tangible benefit was yet to be worked through.
But the question of direct and indirect benefit would be assessed as the scheme design was finalised in the next couple of months.
Lew also noted Southland had now gone to "one targeted rate for all its special rating districts".
Councillor Brett Cummings said having one targeted rate might impact council's ability to tap external funding for new protection projects and that needed investigation.
Ewen noted one submitter viewed a universal approach to special rating areas as potentially penalising them for choosing to live "in less risky areas".
However, it was always on property buyers to be aware of the risk in the first place, he said.
James Sutherland, for Federated Farmers, said the proposed review should go out for full consultation given 6500 ratable properties across the region were not currently within a special rating area.
The report noted rating district asset management as "crucial to support the region" because it:
* protects economic productivity,
* reduces natural hazard risk to communities,
* promotes safety and wellbeing.
During formal LTP deliberations, Cummings said the review was not just about rates but the constitution of the rating districts.
Lew agreed, saying a lot of the submitters had focused only on benefit.
But all aspects of the current rating schemes needed to be reviewed including that some were rated based on land value, others on capital value.
The question of council back-office costs for individual districts also had to be assessed, he said.
Nationwide protests are taking place today (Thursday) having been organised by Te Pāti Māori and other connected to Toitū Te Tiriti movement.
There is likely to be some traffic disruptions so Waka Kotahi are closely monitoring the situation. Below are the locations of these gatherings across … View moreNationwide protests are taking place today (Thursday) having been organised by Te Pāti Māori and other connected to Toitū Te Tiriti movement.
There is likely to be some traffic disruptions so Waka Kotahi are closely monitoring the situation. Below are the locations of these gatherings across the country.
Northland:
Whangārei, Farmer’s car park, 9am.
Kaitāia, Commerce St, 9am.
Auckland:
West Auckland, BP Hobsonville, 6.30am.
South Auckland, Z Petrol station, 6.30am.
North Auckland, Palmers Albany Garden Centre, 6.30am.
Central Auckland, Aotea Square, 11am.
Waikato:
Hamilton, Kirikiriroa Marae, 7.30am.
Matamata, Matamata Woolworths, 6.45am.
Te Puaha, Weraroa Marae, 8.30am.
Hauraki, Victoria Park, 12pm.
Waiariki:
Tauranga, Whareroa Reserve, 8am.
Whakatāne, SH30, 7.30am.
Ōpōtiki, Waioweka bridge, 7am.
Taupō, Lake Terrace, 8am.
Tūrangi, Tūrangi town centre, 9am.
Rotorua, Lake Rd intersection, Old Taupō Rd, Fenton St and Sala St, 7am.
Ikaroa-Rāwhiti:
Tūranganui a Kiwa, Heipipi Park, 7am.
Hastings, Hastings Clock Tower, 7am.
Wairarapa, Masterton Town Hall, 12pm.
Te Tai Hauāuru:
Hāwera, Hāwera Netball Courts, 10.30am.
Palmerston North, Te Marae o Hine, 7.15am.
Tokoroa, Leith Place, 8am.
Wellington:
A hīkoi to Parliament 12pm.
South Island:
Christchurch, Bridge of Remembrance, 11am.
Nelson, Church steps, 12.30pm.
Dunedin, Queens Gardens, 12pm.
These items have been recalled, some in the last few days. If you have one of these items at home, click on the title to see the details to ensure it is not a risk to your household.
Food recalls:
Pams plant based creamy tomato pasta bake
Mrs Rogers Naturals brand gluten free batter mix
… View moreThese items have been recalled, some in the last few days. If you have one of these items at home, click on the title to see the details to ensure it is not a risk to your household.
Food recalls:
Pams plant based creamy tomato pasta bake
Mrs Rogers Naturals brand gluten free batter mix
The Collective brand Suckies strawberry probiotic yoghurt
Product recalls:
Country Road two-tone demm mug
Postie Little Kids adventure pants
Fortis heavy duty weight bench
Honda outboard marine engine
Quincy Mae baby/kids nightwear
Ryobi airwave stapler/nailer
Puretec Filtration
Grabstore pruning saw / chainsaw
Full Speed Ahead crankset
We hope this message was helpful in keeping you and your family safe.
It might not be making quite so many headlines these days, but unfortunately, Covid is still here. If you’re 65 or over, taking care of yourself is just as important as ever.
The good news is, keeping up to date with the Covid vaccine can help protect you from serious illness. It’s free. And… View moreIt might not be making quite so many headlines these days, but unfortunately, Covid is still here. If you’re 65 or over, taking care of yourself is just as important as ever.
The good news is, keeping up to date with the Covid vaccine can help protect you from serious illness. It’s free. And recommended for you and many others as long as you haven’t had the vaccine, or Covid, in the last 6 months.
To book your vaccination, or talk to your healthcare provider.
By local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
Large areas of West Coast land have been tagged in its proposed new district plan for mining despite not holding current mining licences or permits.
A further hearing for the proposed combined district's Te Tai o Poutini Plan will begin on … View moreBy local democracy reporter Brendon McMahon:
Large areas of West Coast land have been tagged in its proposed new district plan for mining despite not holding current mining licences or permits.
A further hearing for the proposed combined district's Te Tai o Poutini Plan will begin on Tuesday in Westport where the proposed planning criteria for the mineral rich region will be examined.
TTPP consultant planner David Badham, in his opening Resource Management Act report to the hearing panel, has flagged an issue with the "disconnect" between the mining zones proposed in the plan as opposed to what is currently permitted for mining purposes in the identified areas.
He specifically flags the Buller Coal Field Zone(BCZ) and the Minerals Extraction Zone (MINZ).
"My overall observation is that there appears to be a significant disconnect between the notified spatial extent of the MINZ and the BCZ, and the proposed criteria used to identify the zone," Badham said.
"Specifically, there appears to be large areas of land that have been included … with no evidence or link to current (mining licence) authorisations.
"As such, there appear to be a number of areas proposed and notified as MINZ and BCZ that do not currently have a defendable basis to be included."
He also touches on a key submitter concern from the region's largest coal miner, Bathurst, on the legal impact of the proposed plan's rules on the 'existing use rights' of miners already operating.
The proposed TTPP will also allow mining in other rural and 'open space' zones across the region outside the MINZ and BCZ.
Badham also said concerns had been raised about the proposed "lawfully established" definition for mining.
This would apply to existing coal mining and ancillary coal mining licences issued under the Coal Mines Act of 1979.
Badham said he understood the definition will need to be more specifically addressed by the hearing panel but in his opinion, existing use definitions within the TTPP do raise "legal issues".
"This primarily relates to the status of existing (mining) licences, and whether or not the rights provided under those licences extend beyond their expiry."
He makes two key recommendations:
* Mine and minerals zoning criteria objectives and policies in the proposed plan should be "a key consideration" for the hearing panel because the wording and approach to these policies will impact the future approach to mine rezoning requests.
* The proposed indigenous biodiversity policies applying to the minerals and mining chapter be deleted.
Badham says while changes to the National Policy Statement on Indigenous Biodiversity (NPS-IB) have been signalled by the current Government, "they have not yet been made".
"As such, I understand that the wording of the NPS-IB must be considered as it is currently worded, not as it may be amended by central government, possibly in the near future."
He is also proposes amendments to,
* permitted activity rules for mineral prospecting and exploration,
* mineral extraction and processing,
* activities ancillary to lawfully established mineral extraction and processing.
*LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air
© Neighbourly 2024
Loading…
